0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÏ º´¿ø ½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú°ÅºÎ(Do-Not-Resuscitate)¿Í °ü·Ã µÈ ÀÇ»ç°áÁ¤»óȲ ºÐ¼®

Analysis of decision-making situation related to DNR(Do-Not-Resuscitate)

Áß¾Ó°£È£³í¹®Áý 2010³â 14±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ 8
KMID : 1128620100140010001
À̹ÌÈñ ( Lee Mi-Hee ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ÀÇ·á¿ø °­³²¼º½Éº´¿ø

Abstract

Purpose: This purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of patients who had DNR and to examine
the medical records related to DNR.

Method: Data were collected by EMR review for all patients who had DNR from January 2007 to September 2007 in one hospital. A total of 145 patients were included.

Result: The DNR request had been made most of the time when the patients¡¯ vital signs or metal status were changed. More than half of the patients were in a comatose state when DNR consent was made and only 18.6% was alert.
The persons involved with DNR decision were patients¡¯ child, spouse, daughter or son-in-law, and brother or sister
and the other family members. The average time interval from DNR consent signed to death was 4.88 days. DNR consent was obtained by written (53.8%) or verbal and formats used in consent was in various styles.

Conclusion: Opportunities to discuss DNR should be offered in advance to all patients while awake. DNR orders
must be written and consent forms should be standardized.
KeyWords
½ÉÆó¼Ò»ý¼ú°ÅºÎ, ȯÀÚ, µ¿ÀǼ­
Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders, Patients, Informed Consent
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸